Counter-rant
Now that I've had enough coffee...
I'm getting fed up listening to faux-cynical gen-x'ers tell us how over charities, and religion, and state-sponsored capitalism they are. Do you know what? Nobody cares. If you're offended by someone wearing a poppy, deal with it. It's not as if their act of rememberance is impinging on one of your increasing number of "human rights", unless it's "my inalienable right to not give a toss about the people who died to shut down the death camps."
And come to think of it, being all cynical and ironical about "fighting for freedom" - catch a grip, here, the pronouncements of an industry of spin-doctors shouldn't make you doubt for a second that there are some things that are worth fighting for, that not all of those things stopped existing in 1945, and that you would be first up against the wall if any one of a number of Glorious Days actually did Come.
And, as Everclear sing, "I hate those people who love to tell you that money is the root of all that kills, they have never been poor they have never known the joy of a Welfare Christmas". If you don't like Children in Need, turn it off, and don't put anything in the cans. Don't moan about it when others do contribute. And don't come around with your vague, No-Logo, list of things that bum me out, man, like saving the whales from nuclear powerstations by driving solar powered cars and drinking wine out of cardboard bottles.
What people need these days is a lot less passion and a lot more good manners.
I'm getting fed up listening to faux-cynical gen-x'ers tell us how over charities, and religion, and state-sponsored capitalism they are. Do you know what? Nobody cares. If you're offended by someone wearing a poppy, deal with it. It's not as if their act of rememberance is impinging on one of your increasing number of "human rights", unless it's "my inalienable right to not give a toss about the people who died to shut down the death camps."
And come to think of it, being all cynical and ironical about "fighting for freedom" - catch a grip, here, the pronouncements of an industry of spin-doctors shouldn't make you doubt for a second that there are some things that are worth fighting for, that not all of those things stopped existing in 1945, and that you would be first up against the wall if any one of a number of Glorious Days actually did Come.
And, as Everclear sing, "I hate those people who love to tell you that money is the root of all that kills, they have never been poor they have never known the joy of a Welfare Christmas". If you don't like Children in Need, turn it off, and don't put anything in the cans. Don't moan about it when others do contribute. And don't come around with your vague, No-Logo, list of things that bum me out, man, like saving the whales from nuclear powerstations by driving solar powered cars and drinking wine out of cardboard bottles.
What people need these days is a lot less passion and a lot more good manners.
no subject
Seriously: *applause*
I don't even have to agree with everything you said to agree whole-heartedly with the sentiment it expresses.
no subject
(no hat, but purple socks).
no subject
Why be serious? Mischief's far more fun,. but it is a long-handled spoon you stir with!
no subject
no subject
And I think you get both ideas...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
If you don't like Children in Need, turn it off, and don't put anything in the cans.
Um, would this be the moment where I tactfully point out that if you don't like it when cynical (nothing faux about it, 'fraid) people who really are irritated by increasing misapplication of the word "freedom" by our opportunist politicians rant about such things, you probably shouldn't read my journal? ;)
no subject
I moved the rant out of being a reply over to my own space because I thought it would be rude doing it in yours (kind of like turning up for a party and insulting the decor).
no subject
Fine. I like yours too. So take THAT.
*peers around the place but can't find anything to insult. Damn it!*
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(runs real fast)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2005-11-15 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)I do owe you an apology, though, I should have been far more general about my comments - they weren't actually aimed at you, more at a non-existent stereotype, and I didn't make enough attempt to establish that, besides moving out of your journal into mine. I made remarks that can naturally be seen as personal when I meant them to be general, and that was just thoughtless and I apologise for that thoughtlessness.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Don't worry about it. You had me at I LIKE reading your journal, so there :)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
*cheers you*
no subject
no subject
no subject
Did you get the picture of you with a glass of red?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)