Who's Afraid of the Fourth Man?

[f4f3]

This isn't what I was expecting to be blogging about tonight. I expected to be talking about my Caledonian odyssey this weekend (Drumna-fucking-drochit?) or the kicking we gave the Bastard English or possibly the Guardian giving page one space to a racist and religious diatribe from one of our greatest living postcard illustrators, and probably I will, but I read yesterday's Guardian Review over dinner, and something caught my eye.
In the Guardian Book club column, John Banville writes entertainlingly about his decision to write a novel based on Antony Blunt. At one point he writes:
"Like so many of my generation I have been, and indeed, still am, fascinated by the Cambridge spies."
And I stopped, and crinkled up my brow. I'm not fascinated by the Cambridge spies. I'm not vaguely interested by the Cambridge spies. I don't, if truth be told, really give a shit about the Cambridge spies. Nobody I know gives a shit about the Cambridge spies, and nobody I've ever spoken to seems to give a shit either. I've always thought I was immune from the Oxbridge chip on my shoulder. I didn't go there, nobody else I know did either, and it never seemed even an option to worry about from my point of view. But I do wonder that somone could say that "So many of his generation" did care. I tend to regard myself as pretty mundane, in that my interests and fascinations are pretty reflective of everyone else's, but I seem to have a blind spot here.
So, knowing that some of my F's out there did go to Oxbridge, is anyone out there fascinated by this? Am I in this particular way less than mundane? Or is it an example of the lensing affect caused by so many of our opinion formers coming from such a closeted background?

Comments

[f4f3.livejournal.com]

Sorry, I was being a bit lazy in my reply. What I meant to say that there is an ever growing majority of Oxbridge graduates (in who's numbers, if you'd allow the laziness, I would place yourself) for whom the Oxbridge Experience is not a central part of their existence or a source of endless fascination to share with themselves or others, but that the views of the minority, by nature of their positions in the Media, Law or Politics, are given undue exposure.

If I can struggle past my laziness to explain one step further, I don't believe that the proportion of Oxbridge graduates occupying senior posts in these fields has changed much (although I'd expect to be proven wrong by anyone with a chip on either shoulder) but that the constitution of that proportion is changing in line with the trend you identify.

How's that?

Oh, and to express a surprising interest, I was cheering on Liverpool against Trinity last night - I hope because Liverpool were the underdogs and came from behind. In my defence, I still don't know if it was Trinity College Cambridge or Dublin.

[liadnan]

Fair enough. The Blonde and Frankie may have more worthwhile views on this, as their Oxbridge experiences were probably more typical than mine -for a start, they were undergraduates. Postgraduates are in a bit of a different world from the start.

[liadnan]

More worth paying attention to than mine I mean, obvs.

[f4f3.livejournal.com]

Obviously, but also more so than mine *g*