"Simpsons did it."
Apr. 25th, 2006 04:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
f4f3Just hepped by this article
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1759802,00.html
to
this speech http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldhansrd/pdvn/lds06/text/60420-18.htm#60420-18_spopq0
I really must get better at inserting links.
As the journalist says, not the sort of speech we see in the commons too often.
Reading both, I was struck by the degree to which ideas that used to be the preserve of writers like Phillip K Dick, and later of cyberpunks like Bruce Sterling are becoming part of everyday life. In 20 years a gap has opened between us "of the Twentieth Century" (a chilling phrase, too) and our children in terms of how we learn the world (apologies to Ken McCleod), and I can't imagine how wide that gulf will be by the time our grandchildren make it on the scene.
At school we used to talk about the possibility of comprehensible allusion (well, when we weren't trying to hit each other with paperclips, and how this was one of the main glues for culture. In those days the allusions we referred to were books, history, the classics - these seem to have been replaced with allusions to tv programs, net events (events which, to misquote Alan Moore, are so small and happen so quickly they can scarcely be said to have happened at all), memes... I'm not going to say that these are any less valuable than those of a previous generation, but they are all distinguished by their brevity - an allusion made today might be dated by next week, or tomorrow, or in an hour. I'm not saying a society can't be built on these connectives, but it will seem a very strange place to us.
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1759802,00.html
to
this speech http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldhansrd/pdvn/lds06/text/60420-18.htm#60420-18_spopq0
I really must get better at inserting links.
As the journalist says, not the sort of speech we see in the commons too often.
Reading both, I was struck by the degree to which ideas that used to be the preserve of writers like Phillip K Dick, and later of cyberpunks like Bruce Sterling are becoming part of everyday life. In 20 years a gap has opened between us "of the Twentieth Century" (a chilling phrase, too) and our children in terms of how we learn the world (apologies to Ken McCleod), and I can't imagine how wide that gulf will be by the time our grandchildren make it on the scene.
At school we used to talk about the possibility of comprehensible allusion (well, when we weren't trying to hit each other with paperclips, and how this was one of the main glues for culture. In those days the allusions we referred to were books, history, the classics - these seem to have been replaced with allusions to tv programs, net events (events which, to misquote Alan Moore, are so small and happen so quickly they can scarcely be said to have happened at all), memes... I'm not going to say that these are any less valuable than those of a previous generation, but they are all distinguished by their brevity - an allusion made today might be dated by next week, or tomorrow, or in an hour. I'm not saying a society can't be built on these connectives, but it will seem a very strange place to us.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 04:27 pm (UTC)This is an area I work in, and I am trying to compose a rational response - I might just make it a post on my journal when I'm done!
no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 07:55 am (UTC)